By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
WessleWoggle on 06 April 2009
Edit Thread
angrypoolman said:
WessleWoggle said:

Many crazy people think evolution is a lie, because they got false information from a creationist website, from their church, a book, or even worse, from their parents. These people are so stupid they don't even take the time up to look and see if the things they heard/read about creationism and evolution are true. They just take the websites/books/churches/authority figures word for it.

Creationist websites often tell numerous falsehoods about evolution, making it seem silly. What's worse is they do so whilst not knowing ANYTHING about evolution. They pick and choose which sciences to use to support their arguments, they don't use the facts to tell the truth, they use the facts to support whatever their current claim is, sometimes even contradicting themselves while doing so. They do to make themselves look right to the average uninformed person.

The average uninformed person, if they have a christian background, may be likely to just take the claims as truth without looking up the actual science behind creationism. No proof of young earth creationism that has been found so far, the only thing they have for proof is false arguments against evolution, and false science to support their crazy claims.

Ever wonder about the great flood? It's total bullshit.

This is what happen if there was really a global flood.
http://www.evolution.mbdojo.com/flood.html


About venomfangx...
Only stupid peopled who know nothing about evolution can be tricked by such creationist slime. I myself even got tricked by venomfangx's bullshit... For about 1 day, before I actually took up the time to look up his claims. All venomfangx's videos do is recycle kent hovind already disproven theories. Kent hovind is whacked out, he makes crazy claims that make the genesis creation and flood make sense...

But when people with a knowledge of science actually run the numbers, his theories are full of holes, and wouldn't work at all. Kent hovind just made all his claims up, he pulled everything out his ass, there's no proof for Kent Hovind's theories.

Some young earth creationists try to put evolution off like it's a religion, that's trying to replace theirs. It's simply not the truth. It's the world view that is gained from examining the evidence without bias. Creationism is the worldview that's gained from looking for evidence to support the bible's creation claims.

 

 

 wow, such a long post.. the bad part is that it doesnt tell me anything. all you do is talk shit. at least when venomfangx makes long videos, he actually tries to support his claims..

from the looks of it, it doesnt seem like you know too much about evolution yourself.

 

 

What do I have to tell you? What claim did I make that you are against?

Creationism is crazy bullshit. If you dispute this tell me why, rather than just telling me I'm being offensive. The fact that I'm offensive doesn't prove that all I do is sling shit, granted I like to sling shit, but I know what I'm talking about.

Hahahaha, I do more than talk shit. For example, here's something I wrote about in the past:



I dislike young earth creationism. It contains little validity, a lot of bullshit.

First off this is the page I was looking at, 10 proofs for creationism:
http://75.125.60.6/~creatio1/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=36

Proof #1 The Fossil Record, is bullshit:
["T]he lack of transitional series cannot be explained as being due to the scarcity of material."


Wtf? YES IT CAN! We're lucky to have any fossils at all, let alone transitional fossils.

"This supposed column is actually saturated with "polystrate fossils" (fossils extending from one geologic layer 
to another) that tie all the layers to one time-frame.

Hmm, I somehow don't see how fossils going through one or more layers somehow proves that it's all one time frame.

Polystrate fossils, such as trees going through multiple strata layers, is easily explained:
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/polystrate.html

Proof #2 Decay of Earth's Magnetic Field.. is total bullshit:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/dave_matson/young-earth/specific_arguments/magnetic_field.html

Proof #3 The Global Flood is total bullshit:
http://www.evolution.mbdojo.com/flood.html

Proof #4 Population Statistics, is total bullshit:
http://skepticwiki.org/index.php/Population_Growth

Proof #5 Radio Halos, one again bullshit:
http://paleo.cc/ce/halos.htm

Proof #6 Human Artifacts throughout the Geologic Colum, Is total bullshit:

"a human sandal print with trilobite in Cambrian rock, human footprints and a handprint in Cretaceous rock 
point to the fact that all the supposed geologic periods actually occurred at the same time in the recent past." 

NO, it's points to the fact that the humans that came AFTER, and explored the areas, left traces of themself.
It doesn't prove that the rocks themselves are from modern history. Only the hand/footprint is from modern
history, not the rock itself. 

Proof #7 Helium Content In Earths Atmosphere:
http://www.usd.edu/esci/age/content/creationist_clocks/helium.html

Proof #8 Expansion of space fabric, bullshit:
http://www.reduciblycomplex.com/index.php/2008/12/30/evidence-for-creation-debunked-part-8/

Proof #9 Design in Living Systems:
Basically this is trying to argue that we're irreducably complex.. Complexity is complexity, it does not indicate design. http://skepticwiki.org/index.php/Irreducible_complexity

Proof #10 Design in the Human Brain:
Same argument as #9, it's bullshit. Complexity does not equal design

 

 

There. :P Good enough for you?