Kasz216 on 06 April 2009
Well rather then get into the long world of journal databases and explain...
Do you honestly believe that it is ok to present a point.... Then one point of criticism (of which there are many) then to claim that point was refuted and therfore the person's study was validated? (Whether the point was refuted or not)
While ignoring all other problems and controversy?
I mean one might make Intellegent Design look like a credible theory with that method.
Also... what in Solomon's edits do you disagree with?
