Staude on 06 April 2009
| scottie said: Ok, a quick comparison Backgrounds MG:Touch - detailed, lighting effects, good textures Your game: simplistic, no lighting effects, bad textures Character models MG:touch - crisp, realistic, detailed Your game - lacking in detail, unrealistic - As I don't know a thing about the game, I'm not sure if that is the art style or just that that's the best the PS1 could do I recognise that Metal gear Touch is easier to make it look good, due to the fact that it is not proper 3d. That's why I challenged you to find any game on the PS1 that actually looks better. Find a game on the PS1 that isn't actually 3d, because that game you provided looks at least a gen behind MG:Touch |
Look at the video again. The game is so simplistic that it holds nothing to the ps1 game. The ps1 game has more action and movement going on.. and it looks better.
Here. Same genre, 3d and a lot lot more action packed.
And you can't deny. This game is .. 10-20 times more advanced then the mgt game.
Check out my game about moles ^
