scottie on 06 April 2009
Ok, a quick comparison
Backgrounds
MG:Touch - detailed, lighting effects, good textures
Your game: simplistic, no lighting effects, bad textures
Character models
MG:touch - crisp, realistic, detailed
Your game - lacking in detail, unrealistic - As I don't know a thing about the game, I'm not sure if that is the art style or just that that's the best the PS1 could do
I recognise that Metal gear Touch is easier to make it look good, due to the fact that it is not proper 3d. That's why I challenged you to find any game on the PS1 that actually looks better. Find a game on the PS1 that isn't actually 3d, because that game you provided looks at least a gen behind MG:Touch
