appolose said:
A. I've read your response several times and I'm really not sure what you mean. |
Was my response similarly unclear? Please let me know if so, and I'll do my best to clarify (I know that these issues can be really sticky to discuss intelligibly).
Or, if I somehow inadvertently insulted you or crossed a line, please know that wasn't my intention, and I apologize.
|
[...] the real question would be, regarding a method of truth, why did you pick that particular worldview/belief since they're all just as possibly true or possibly false? That's the issue. |
And if I were to try to boil down the first part of my response to one question, this would probably be that question, to you:
Why do you pick your particular worldview/belief (skepticism; nothing is certain) since, according to the views you've advanced, they're all just as possibly true or possibly false?
Though, if possible, I would also like to know your thoughts on the issue of "certainty," so that we can better discuss that aspect, too. (Again, please let me know if I need to try to make my thoughts clearer.)
