| Samus Aran said: I own a wii only, I'm not in to graphics all that much really. I'm just saying that killzone 2 looks better then gears of war for those 2 reasons. I like gears of war 2 more then killzone2(I've played both at my friends house) even though killzone 2 looks better. Conclusion of this thread: They're both great games and everyone bitching about the graphics of these games need to get a life. |
You must not own a HDTV. Gears had about the same about of time of development as Killzone 2, if not more. You must think Gears 2 tech development only started after Gears 1. Gears 2 leveraged ALL the tech development over the entire time period Gears was in development (around 2004). Your reasons fail terribly.
Going by your rationale, Too Human was suppose to look better than Killzone 2. It had 7 to 8 years of development and around a $80 million budget. What about Alan Wake? It was in development longer than Killzone 2. Killzone 2 has 3 to 3.5 years of development time. The E3 2005 trailer was before they started work on Killzone 2. The Alan Wake E3 2005 trailer wasn't pre-rendered. Development had already started. Do you think Alan Wake will be technically better than Killzone 2?
People need to try a better excuse. It's just lame and anyone with technical knowledge knows the Killzone 2 development time was normal for games.
