mrstickball said:
Legal benefits between consenting homosexuals is fine. One of the arguments is that gay culture isn't interested in monogamy. For example:
The last study has also shown than "all couples with a relationship lasting more than 5 years have incorporated some provision for outside sexual activity in their relationships."...Do you realize how damning that is for benefits/acklowledgement for recognizing rights for a group of people that really aren't interested in monogamy? I'm not trying to demonize homosexuals. But those are in fact, actual statistics about the community. With a culture that's not interested in marriage....Why should it be awarded that? How about every homosexual bath house is closed in America, in return for gay marriage? Would that be acceptable to the gay community? |
Well I don't think I personally am going to have more than 51 sexual partners...
Unless my significant other is into threeways? Unless I'm into orgies?
Well, what's wrong with sex out of marriage if you use protection?
Marriage has nothing to do with who, or how many people you fuck anyway.







