By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mibuokami said:
Dgc1808 said:
mibuokami said:
I have this awful feeling that this game could turn out to be a cluster f--k. Having played end-game Wow when it was still hard-as-nail (Nax), I know from expirience that it takes A LOT of organization make people work like a cohesive team with individually crucial role.

Thankfully, MAG won't be an extremely time-sensitive or role-crucial game because there's no way you can get 256 people to be 'tactical'.

Graphic looks a bit meh at the moment and I'm hating the weapon visual after expiriencing KZ2... hopefully, the graphic will be much improved come release and there is no subscription... then I might give this game a go.

 

Hmmmm... when you think about it... a subscribtion could help to weed out the dumbasses....

It might weed out a few dumbasses but it will also kill the franchise.

No, I'd rather live with the idiots than not be able to play the game due to lack of players.

 

Yea, let me take a look at Xbo..... World of......

Annoying people in online games are going to be there no matter what. I highly doubt paying to play your game is going to help much unless it's just to give a mentallity that it's doing something against them. Who knows, maybe it does help a little bit, but the annoying people usually standout more so I don't think it helps much in the long run.