By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheRealMafoo said:
WessleWoggle said:
mrstickball said:
The issue is that we've blurred the lines between what marriage is (a union between a man and a woman, ordained by God) and a civil union (co-habitation with legal rights).

 

 

The issue is, marriage is not for you or religion to define.

It's for the government to define, and they shouldn't define it religiously.

 

What? That's like saying:

The issue is, god is not for you or religion to define.

It's for the government to define, and they shouldn't define it religiously.



Marriage is a product of religion. The problem is government recognizing marriage as anything, not that religion shouldn't define it.

 

God is for the individual to define, not the government. Your parody of my statement makes no sense.

Marriage is not the product of religion. Where do you get this from? Study some tribal people and you'll plainly see marriage comes about because they don't want men to fuck women like wild animals. They want men to care for a women they fuck, and care for the children that come from it. That's where marriage comes from.