By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
psrock said:
It may be Obama is spending too much, the problem is you guys don't have an answer either. I'll take my chances with some one who actually looks for average people instead of the previous president who took care of his rich friends.

The Gini coeeficent which is the current accepted statistical indicator of the divison of wealth showed that Bush was the best president for this since like WW2.

Under Bush the Rich did not get richer.  The gap between the rich and poor grew much slower then among any other president.

The biggest culprits of this?

Reagan and Clinton.

Moral of the story.  Republicans and Democrats both just look out for their rich friends.

Bush was different because he didn't look out for anybody.

come on man, do you really believe what you just wrote? me and you live in the real world,  The first thing Bush did was reward the rich as soon as he got into office with his tax cuts.

More some 60 percent of the 2001 tax cuts went to the wealthiest 1 percent of taxpayers.

 

 



 Next Gen 

11/20/09 04:25 makingmusic476 Warning Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.)