Rise of atheism: 100,000 Brits seek 'de-baptism'

[appolose]

donathos said:

Final-Fan said:

appolose said:
But I do not see why the one that best explains the situation (without explaining enough or something else additionally) means we can only take that one as the one to assume

There's your problem, son. Just because it's the best explanation doesn't make it obligatory.  If we could say that one model of car was the best, that wouldn't force anyone to choose it ... but it would be sensible, because it's the best.  

How is it you can say in a sentence what takes me a whole page? :)  I'm sincerely jealous. 

 

 But you said it was the only one we could take justifiably, which would mean the only one.  And what makes it the best, anyways?

EDIT: Oh, just a second, donathos.  I didn't see you're other reply.

EDIT 2: Nevermind, this will be fine.