| nuckles87 said: No....I'm not quite sure what your looking at, but the game only has 9 reviews on Game Rankings, and only 8 are being used in the actual score because ONM is still a fairly new magazine. The other articles are previews. And if you actually read the reviews your using in this topic, for Rush and Rush Adventure, you'll see they say things like "best Sonic game since the Genesis days" and "better then the 3D ones". I haven't read a critical review yet saying the Dreamcast titles are better. This may be your opinion, but it is not an opinion held by critics or anyone outside of the Sonic fan community. Secret Rings was considered the best 3d Sonic yet by critics, and it scored a 70%. I doubt the Adventure titles would score any better if released today. |
Critics often said the same about Sonic Heroes, a game that the Sonic community hates on a level even greater than Shadow the Hedgehog. At the end of the day SA and SA2 are regarded substantially higher than the 3D games that followed, because 1) They are better games; and 2) Upon their initial release they were regarded as exceptional games that successful brought Sonic to 3D. Unfortunately the 3D games that followed were mediocre, and painful affairs that were practically unplayable, however there is little correlation for the work done on the Dreamcast and that which followed.
