appolose on 01 April 2009
vlad321 said:
appolose said:
1. Time is a physical concept, so it's resultant of sense data judgement. So, in that context, it too could be "wrong". And I do not see how that would mean I cannot trust my own reasoning, then. When I was denying (A), I was denying the "living" part (as in, bodily). Although, I might be pressed to think that "I" don't necessarily exist, either, although that may depend on what I mean by "I". Also, Bertrand Russel disagreed with Descartes on that point ;)
2. Yes, that's correct. Although, sense data could be used nontheless to support any view anyways, so it doesn't really matter, as I maintain that sense judgement is arbitrary.
|
I've mentioned it before. Here is the difference between your senses and empiricism and the sense of faith or god and whatnot. I walk up to all 6+ billion people, I punch them. Every single one will get hurt. I ask them abot their sense of faith, many will say that's just bullshit and a figment of other's imaginations.
|
There are 6 billion people? There are people? How did you come to that conclusion?
Okami
To lavish praise upon this title, the assumption of a common plateau between player and game must be made. I won't open my unworthy mouth.
