By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Rpruett on 31 March 2009
Edit Thread
Garnett said:
Rpruett said:
Garnett said:
BHR-3 said:
wat does it cost them to make the ps2?

there undermining the ps3 right now b/c they want the ps2 to last a 10 year life wait till ps2 hits 10 years old then theyll get aggressive with the ps3

 

Thats stupid,While sony is living on a dying console with no competitor,while the PS3 the next gen console has the same future as the PS2 has now,very little to none.

 

 

Lol.  My god are you a fanboy.

 

 

So im a fanboy because Sony is letting the PS3 die while the PS2 is on life support,cut the PS2 already,put BC back in the PS3 and bam a $50 cut would help nice.

 

While Sony tires to support the PS2 the 360 is still out selling the PS3 week to week and that 8 million game will only get bigger.

Between your sigline, your general attitude, your very predictable behavior.  It's so entirely obvious.  It's actually quite funny that someone defended you for 'not' liking Kill Zone 2.  Ofcourse you didn't like KZ2.  

 

 

What part about the PS2 and PS3 targeting two completely different markets do you not understand?  The PS2 is netting Sony almost entirely profit. (Even at $100).  While still keeping the 'Sony' name in the limelight for consumers.   Dropping the PS3 price AND adding BC only costs Sony more money and probably creates a loss to some extent for them. 

Sony is better suited to maintain profits on the PS3 / Profits on the PS2 and reduce the price when it makes sense for them financially. 

 

Only fanboys care about marketshare.  Especially in the HD generation when almost every third party game goes Multi-platform anyways.