Nintendo Wii owners, it's time to acknowledge third party failures

[Khuutra]

BMaker11 said:

Khuutra said:

Now, now, don't skip ahead of me, that's not what I'm doing. Nintendo undoubtedly makes more than third parties. But let's take that $16 and do something interesting with it.

We can pretend that HD console third parties pay licensing fees low enough that they make the same amount per unit sold as Nintendo does - they don't, not even close, but we're going to pretend they do. Let's say, in this world where Nintendo gets $16 per copy of Super Mario Galaxy, that HD 3rd parties get the same amount.

Now, is this fair? Or, at least, if it's unfair, is it unfair in favor of the HD consoles?

It's unfair because your hypothetical is just fallicious. We know HD 3rd party games make less money per unit than an in-house Nintendo game. Hell, they make less per unit than a Sony/M$ game. It's apples and oranges. What you should be comparing is 3rd party Wii vs 3rd party HD

It's not apples and oranges. The only question is how much it takes to be profitable.

Can I say HD third parties make as much as Nintendo per unit sold? I know it's not true: I said it's not true. I'm trying to make a point that assumes HD console owners make more money than you think they do.

Can I assume this sixteen dollars, since it means fewer copies would need to be sold for HD third parties to turn a profit?