Not to be rude but a large portion of this article seems like a more professionally written fanboy thread that we would see posted on the Sony forum ... Its not necessarily that her points are so awful (although a couple are) the problem is that her reasoning is awful.
Consider her argument that the PS3 is going to be the next Saturn/Dreamcast ...
First off, I owned a Dreamcast and the "Myth" of the Dreamcast is far different from the reality. What made the Dreamcast seem special was that developers took advantage of it early, had a decent vision about what the "Next Generation" meant, and there was a steady stream of good (not necessarily great) games that demonstrated this vision. When compared to the awful line-up of games for the first 9 (or so) months for the PS2 this looked fantastic, and the announcment of the Dreamcast being discontinued made this "good" line-up into the myth of the amazing game line-up.
Now, the real reason why I think the comment seems so "fanboyish" is that the PS3 and XBox 360 share 90% of their games, and of the remaining 10% of games 90% of their exclusives have an equlivalent game on the other system ... I don't think one system gets elevated to greatness while another system can be ignored based on a library which is (realistically) 1% different.
