TheRealMafoo on 30 March 2009
| MontanaHatchet said: Mafoo, that was pretty dumb. Your logic would lead someone to believe that a person could be completely pure, but once they get a gun, they decide to kill someone. Gun control is designed to make it harder for people with intent to get guns. And crimes in rural areas are harder to track anyways. If a gunshot goes off in a major city, you can bet that any of the houses in earshot will hear it. But rural areas? Not as likely. Guns are not the reason people kill. That's like saying cake is why people eat. But cake is a good food, and guns are a damn good way of killing someone. |
What? That’s the exact opposite of my point. My point is people are going to kill or not kill regardless of a gun. A gun does not make one more or less likely to want to kill someone.
I have a 3000 pound object that goes over 100 miles an hour. If I wanted to kill someone, I sure as hell don’t need a gun.
The problem is what motivates people in this country to want to kill? Work towards getting rid of that, and forget about the guns.
