By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DMeisterJ said:
I'd actually compare the first Monster Hunter on each console for an accurate representation.

PSP didn't have a problem shifting a good amount of units of the first MH even though it was the first game on the platform. So MHG Wii should be able to shift a lot of units even though it is the first game of the series on the platform. That's a perfectly valid comparison. I'm probably going to find the installed bases of each of the systems at launch, and first week sales in order to compare all three, but yeah, I'm not waiting to MH3 to compare to MHF and MH on PS2. It makes no sense to compare MH3 when there is nothing to compare it too.

It'd be unfair to compare MH3 to MHF because it'd be the second game on the platform, and userbase may have grown. It's fair to compare MH3 to MHP2 (not 2G) because it's the second on the PSP.

It's going to be nice to see if the crowd translates over to the Wii to play, or if the PSP version sells better. AFAIK the PSP ones aren't pay-to-play online, and they offer ad-hoc play with anyone else who has the game, while the console version doesn't... But we shall see...

You know, you're right. BioShock 2 is going to tank massively, looking at BioShock's sales at the PS3. It seems the 360 is a much better system for the BioShock franchise.