So the summarize our discussion, sqrl...
You don't want me judging you based on one incident, yet you judged the sales clerk on the exact same incident (to your profit of $80) and judged me for discussing the same incident.
You say you don't disagree with my message, that you didn't like the way I said it because it was lecturing from a stranger, yet you then lecture me for my delivery of that message.
You somehow expect us to believe that you couldn't stop the sales clerk from giving you change more than once. Are you being honest in that? Is that part of you not disagreeing with my message?
You decided to support the dishonesty mentioned in this thread, and I am supporting being honest.
And now you are calling me the fool.
Just so that I understand your position.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
