By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Legend11 said:
ookaze said:
All of this because people can't admit that 1 disc is better than several.
Swapping was always a problem, but people could stand it because there was no better solution.

It's amazing that people want to eat crow in place of the company officials that said the nonsense.
If your company officials made stupid comments like BluRay space was useless, and then games for his console starts needing 4 discs, well, that's their crow to eat, not yours.
But no, the fanboys will go as far as saying they were right against all logic and against the facts.

Sad...

So is not having to swap discs for 2 games out of 200+, something that likely takes most people less than a minute and a half (30seconds to swap dvds x 3 dvds), really worth $160 (the likely additional cost the 360 would have been if it had came with a HD-DVD drive)?


   ookaze, I fully admit 1 disk is better than several.  And I think everyone else here, would as well.  But plenty of us don't have a problem with getting off our rump once in a while to swap the disk.  I am with Legend11.  I find it a VERY MINOR inconvienence to take half a minute, to swap a disk a few times within the dozens of hours of play.  It would not be worth it to me, to pay the extra cost it would have been, for the Xbox 360 to instead make it on one HD-DVD.



Tag: Hawk - Reluctant Dark Messiah (provided by fkusumot)