| Alacrist said: Microsoft, Sony, or Nintendo? Should Sony go because they are using a gaming machine to push blue-ray? Should Microsoft go because you have to pay for online to get the full features of your game? Should Nintendo go because they are not pushing HD graphics like the other two? Please give thoughtful post with goo reasons why gaming would be better without them,(I'm speaking of this generation like how would gaming be better if there was no Wii or no360 or no PS3) and please none of that, This company sucks! stuff ok. Thank You ahead of time for you post! |
PS3, its price potentially sets a bad trend, which we can see coming in MS's move to introduce the Elite, this can only alienate more potential buyers in the long run and contract the market, what's next? Will next gen systems cost $1000?
In addition its focus on multimedia rather than games is unfortunate, blu-ray isn't needed at the moment and yet they fell the need to push it down the throats of the consumers, better to have used that money on attracting more devlopers to the system and having a great lineup on a $400 machine instead of a mediocre lineup on a $600 machine
Predictions:Sales of Wii Fit will surpass the combined sales of the Grand Theft Auto franchiseLifetime sales of Wii will surpass the combined sales of the entire Playstation family of consoles by 12/31/2015 Wii hardware sales will surpass the total hardware sales of the PS2 by 12/31/2010 Wii will have 50% marketshare or more by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!! It was a little over 48% only)Wii will surpass 45 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!! Nintendo Financials showed it fell slightly short of 45 million shipped by end of 2008)Wii will surpass 80 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2009 (I was wrong!! Wii didn't even get to 70 Million)
Essay Pro