| libellule said: I dont understand some of you. 1 BR > 4 DVD as 1DVD > 4 CD that is all, it is not even about Xbox360 (DVD+games) or PS3 (BR+no games) it is about "logic" if you don't understand this, then YOU are a Xbox360 fanboy """I will take 4-DVDs game, heck even 8 DVDs game over NO game on Blu-Ray or HD-DVD. What good is technology if you don't have good software to run on it?""" lol But, I agree, this is NOT a big problem to play on 4 DVD ... (what is the interest of this thread except starting a flamewar ?) |
I don't disagree with you that Blu-Ray or HD-DVD is better than DVD (when it come to space).  Heck, I won't even disagree with you that technically PS3 is in many ways is more advance than the Xbox 360. Actually I was so close in getting PS3 as it is actually a "better" deal for what you pay for - Blu-Ray drive, built in wi-fi , (not to mention a much better built hardware than the junk MS put out) however in the end the reason I went to shop for the new console is to play game and frankly for that the 360 is by far the best platform.Â
Which lead me to my point that you seems to miss, is the fact that Blu-Ray and Cell were always bring up as what make PS3 a better gaming system than the 360. But this is obviously not the case at least not at the moment, and this is not because Blu-Ray or Cell suck, but because frankly there are seriouly lack of quality software on PS3. So in the end DVD-9 or Blu-Ray doesn't mean crap if you don't have games to play on it.  Â
You can call me whatever you want fanboy, xbot, Sony-haters but seriously, as a gamers why would it matter if the game is on 4-DVDs or 1-Blu-Ray. Blu-Ray does not make bad game good or DVDs make great game bad. If PS3 have more quality games I would have bought it regardless if it has Blu-ray or DVD.Â
Â
