By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
NanakiXI said:
Kasz216 said:
CGI-Quality said:
@ kas

What makes IGN's opinion right, and his wrong though?

Nothing, which is my point.

Nothing makes his opinion right and mine wrong either.

Hence your claims of "quality" declining aren't based on anything. 

Defeating your entire point.

Hence the bringing up of IGN someone some people consider an "expert" in the field.

Your forced to either abandon your basis of arguement, or admit you were wrong.

 

Wow your point couldn't even hit the broad side of a barn.

How so?  How does one define quality then... if we aren't using sales or "expert" websites.

It seems to be... "It's my personal opinion and anyone who disagrees is an idiot!"

If not how do you guage quality?

 

 

Let us just agree to disagree because I'll never see it from your point of view and you will never see it from a FFVII fans point of view.

I don't know how to explain quality to you in form of a game because it is more objectional. Where else I could tell you the difference in a Jeep compared to the rest shit quality cars Chrystler produces. I think though more blood, sweat and tears were poured into making FFVII than most FF games except XIII. FFVII tried to be so much more than what it was but it is still great. I think that being said FFVII is better quality.

But let us just agree to disagree. You can have the final word if you want though.



FootballFan - "GT has never been bigger than Halo. Now do a comparison between the two attach ratios and watch GT get stomped by Halo. Reach will sell 5 million more than GT5. Quote me on it."