TheRealMafoo on 24 March 2009
| The_vagabond7 said: Just as a hypothetical, would you be against universal healthcare coverage if somebody came up with a fantastic plan that didn't have any of the supposed major flaws of other UHC plans? If it could be set up that the government had very efficient, cost effective method of offering healthcare to everyone with little to no wait time funded by a small tax on some common products (hypothetical here, not realistic), would you be against it on ideological grounds? Would you deny people healthcare if they didn't "earn" it? Simply as a hypothetical, not as a "well that's not realistic, that would never happen" ect ect. If there was great, effecient, cheap universal healthcare for everyone in america would you be angry about it because deadbeats could have get great health care the same as factory workers who could have it the same as highly educated hedge fund owners? |
I am all for stepping in and fixing healthcare. And if what you say could be done, I would not be against it.
It would be against my ideology, but if what you painted could be done, I would not argue against it.
But there has never been an example of government running anything well. I would be much more for government reform then I would the government taking over.
