MikeB on 20 September 2007
@ libellule
sincerely, this "developper" is nothing than a fanboy.
it is obvious he is pushing the Xbox360 and not the PS3.
so obvious.
I'm not even saying the Xbox360 is not superior.
Note this !
I'm saying that this "developper" is BS. He has basically no argues.
it is obvious he is pushing the Xbox360 and not the PS3.
so obvious.
I'm not even saying the Xbox360 is not superior.
Note this !
I'm saying that this "developper" is BS. He has basically no argues.
I wonder what he developes? XNA minigames?
There are a lot of different perspectives, some comments are politically and commercially motivated. Another perspective:
(September 16, 2007) Developer: Xbox 360 games keeping up with PS3, but not for long
"GAMER.BLORGE.com has learned exclusively what some of the key points of the Xbox vs PS3 war are, and it's not all about the Halo."
"Where the real problem stem is in the two system's processors. While Xbox games can be tweaked to move up to the PS3, the reverse is not always the case. Due to the PS3's advanced processor, games developed for the Sony backed platform sometimes can't be downgraded to the the 360's chip.
With the 360 being in the range of 2 years old now, it is said they have used about 90% of the systems resources, which allows for some PS3 games to be ported over, but it will become rarer as time goes on. As they push the PS3's performance, they will finally surpass the abilities of the 360 completely.
So where are you left in the console war? Why are developers still coming out with so few PS3 games? It's really just that much easier to work with the 360.
In the end though, who does our undisclosed developer think will win? While they gave no time frame for the inevitable victory, they were very clear that they thought the long haul champion would be the PS3 for this round of the overall war."
IMO we can make up our own minds by looking at the hardware specs, anything software related be that game engines or developer tools will be enhanced in due time.