By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
numonex on 21 March 2009
Edit Thread
seece said:
numonex said:

Thanks for the heads up. I will not be buying those two games. Capcom make crap games. IMO DMC 4 sucked. I do not have high hopes for SF IV and RE5. I played RE5 demo and it was a total POS.

Reviewers give all games 5 to 10 points more to all games across the board, the reviews are sussed and should not be taken seriously.

RE5 has 85 on metacritic - it should be 75 to 80.
SF IV has 93 on metacritic - it should be 83 to 88.

GTA IV scored 97 on metacritic and that game deserves no higher than 87 - I would give  it 82. Reviews are rigged and game reviewers are corrupt.

How can you give either games a score when you havn't played either ... I don't get it ..

 

RE5: I played the demo and hated it and well I do not like the gameplay mechanics, the stop pop gameplqy is crap. It is RE 4.5 by what I have heard from gamers opinions who have played both RE4 and RE5.

 SF IV: I hate fighting games - they are boring button mashers. Played one, played them all. I have read different people's opinions from gamers that matter more to me than reviewers

If games get high critic reviews - we all have to accept it? No, I do not think so. These high reviews could be paid for by game developers trying to sell more copies of the game.