If the PS3 drops to $300 Microsoft should:

[Rpruett]

nightsurge said:

Rpruett said:

JaggedSac said:
He is right. They posted the 1 billion dollar loss for RRoD related costs in one of their financial reports around a year ago. The information is public and freely accessible.

 

I'm not saying they didn't post it. They posted it somewhere obviously.  Did they include it in that entertainment division profit/loss report that was shown?  Was it a definite cost included in that report summary?  I'm not so sure.

Yes, it was!  Sheesh.  One small little concerned individual with a hunch means nothing.  Do some research and figure it out once and for all if you are sooooo concerned about where Microsoft put it's RRoD costs at.

And again, I see there is no point arguing with you because you just branch off into other things and dismiss my arguments anyway.  Remember the thrashing you received when you argued that an integrated graphics solution was great for PC gaming?

You have no hard evidence to support your theory.  I could careless where Microsoft put it's RROD costs at. You could be right, I could be right it's really irrelevant. None of us work at MS and know the exactness of their figures.  I don't need to know to sleep at night.  

However, Microsoft (And tons of companies) smudge several product lines together to hide the costs (Both positive and negative) to make the overall picture look better. 

 

As I remember in the previous discussion about Integrated Graphics,   I never said they were 'great' for gaming. I merely said they were feasible (not optimal) for pretty much every PC/360 game.   Which they are.