| nightsurge said: @Rpruett They have nowhere near similar attach rates. The PS3 and the Wii have similar, but the 360's is like 2-3 more games per console sold than both of them. And before you try to counter this point, I will make these following statements: We already told you that the RRoD is paid off. |
The attach ratio is skewed by being released a full year ahead of time and when you factor this in they are actually pretty comparable (Still better, but comparable and certainly not some night and day difference compared to other consoles).
Is the RROD paid off in those figures? Are you 100% positive? Are you sure those figures have assigned the RROD? I'm not sure, but I highly doubt you are either. You are just guessing.
That's entirely the point. The physical dollar amount being less on the 360s (Which is really the only thing that matters as it pertains to cost?). The PS3 doesn't need to reach as low as the costs of 360's hardware. At some point, both will be so low it's negligible in difference.
Again you aren't counting Sony's first party studios which most certainly make a profit. (Something Microsoft doesn't really have). Which adds profit to their bottom line.
The numbers speak for themselves as far as I'm concerned. Microsoft has managed one year of overall profit. We will see how many more they can manage.







