TheRealMafoo on 18 March 2009
| akuma587 said: You are applying that logic incorrectly. You can be X and not be Y. And you can be X and be Y. But just because you are X does not mean you are Y. You need to go back and review conditional language and when something is sufficient or necessary within a condition. |
Lol, nice way to try and defuse the joke by saying that I don’t understand logic.
It was a joke. You should know what one of those is, you helped elect one.
