Snake2 said:
PATRIOT7ME said:
Snake2 said:
PATRIOT7ME said:
Snake2 said:
PATRIOT7ME said:
Snake2 said:
PATRIOT7ME said:
Snake2 said:
--OkeyDokey-- said:
PATRIOT7ME said:
No wii FPS games tsk tsk |
Maybe cause they all suck? (unless you consider Metroid a shooter). |
you should not aasociate shooters with the wii
|
this thread is for shooters. Why not? Also Wii has had good shooters. has had good TPS,FPS and rail shooters
|
Sorry had not noticed your post, reason being there are too few shooters on the Wii. With not even a single game ranked over 90+ metacritic. The Nintendo Wii is the home of platformers, shooters is the home of the ps3/360.
|
Excuse if it ain't at least 90% it isn't worthy of being posted that is plain dumb. You guys don't what a good game is. A game doesn't need 90% to be good.
|
of course not but i was just talking from a general perspective
|
Then there is no reason for Metroid Prime 3, medal Of Honor Heroes 2 and Cod 5 wii on here they are all at 80%
|
cod5 is in the list meaning all platforms, but the other games mentioned havent really shaped nor defined the genre.
|
yes they have. motion controls. All those other shooters aren't really revolutionary
|
Killzone 2, halo 3, cod4 etc, all revolutionary online play motion control is not how a shooter is suposed to be played,
|
Wow! all those shooters you named are just past gen shooters that have been updated with better graphics with improved online. Also PC had online gaming first. So, no it isn't revolutionary because online was on the PC first and isn't something new. Excuse me no motion control? You guys talk about how realistic a shooter needs to be but won't let motion controls be allowed since it does add realism but letting you aim the gun. 360 and PS3 may look realisitic but they don't play realistic like the WIi.
