Rath on 16 March 2009
I was thinking early-classical. But you're right in saying it probably wasn't 100% but pre-Pythagoras it must nearly have been 100%. Anyway, its beside the point =P.

I was thinking early-classical. But you're right in saying it probably wasn't 100% but pre-Pythagoras it must nearly have been 100%. Anyway, its beside the point =P.

About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.