By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sieanr on 18 September 2007
Edit Thread
starcraft said:
Most of what he has said is biased, based on bad sources or no sources at all, or completely founded on false assumptions, but you gotta hand it to Mike, he's defended those false assumptions and biased manipulations to the death in this thread.

For the record, and so I don't seem entirly bias, I think the PS3 is more powerful than the 360. However, that amount of power has been significantly overstated by MikeB as well as supported by outright stupid comparisons. The 360 has the better GPU, whereas the PS3 has a CPU better suited for visuals and physics. Whereas the PS3 has a brute strength advantage, I think the 360 is the overall more balanced and effiecient design.

What really matters is what is done with the power available. Gears looks amazing, just like heavenly sword. But when differences may really be seen in a couple years, that difference in power wont really matter.

Overall, I'd say its a lot like the GC v Xbox - at most a bit more.

 



Leo-j said: If a dvd for a pc game holds what? Crysis at 3000p or something, why in the world cant a blu-ray disc do the same?

ssj12 said: Player specific decoders are nothing more than specialized GPUs. Gran Turismo is the trust driving simulator of them all. 

"Why do they call it the xbox 360? Because when you see it, you'll turn 360 degrees and walk away"