PSN isn't failing now, but it sure failed in the beginning, causing a lot of people who wanted a good multi player experience to go to the X360, even though online cost money in those times. Now, Home did fail when it came out because it was supposed to be revolutionary but everyone was disappointed. You people praise PSN for being free, but what if they actually charged? Don't you think home would've been done like 2 years ago instead of it being half done right now? PSN does allow you to play online, but the total experience is just not on par with the package of Live. If Sony charged, they would've had much more resources to make Home throw Live out the window. But i guess they want to keep the free part, and it's one of their arguments against live and it's reflected here also, because that's basically the only argument i see here in this topic to say PSN>Live. I don't think that's a sound argument but never mind.
Since i haven't had much experience with PSN lately, let me ask you guys a few questions that Live does offer which i find very useful at times.
When you're playing against a random person on PSN, can you just click their name and see all the info about them in-game (played games, bio, location etc)?
Can you send a private chat invite to anyone in-game?
Can you invite anyone into your game (including people who are not your friends)?
Can you create a party?
Can you send text/voice messages in game?
Can you mute people with a mic (that means, person selective, not mute everyone at once)?
Can you send messages to people who are not your friends at any time?
Can you see a list of who you've played against the last few times?
Can you submit a player review about his behavior?
Can you see what anyone in your friends list in doing in that particular moment (which game he's playing, which mode, online or offline etc)
I have more questions but lets keep it at this for now.
Truth does not fear investigation
