BTFeather55 said:
@kazs615
there is a reason why those Republicans give to those charities and that is because they get to write those donations off on their tax returns.
we had eight years of republicanism and conservatism under Reagan and there is a reason most of the poor and the african american community consider him to be the worst president ever just as there is with Bush and his eight years of helping out his daddy's friends to get richer and trying to fight his daddy's wars, plus trying to make it impossible to be able to sue doctors while not caring if african americans and lower class citizens sank or swam unless they were willing to go be expendable in an ill-funded 'cause that would cut into the net profits going to Cheney's Haliburton war for oil.
|
The Gini Coeefficent under George W Bush did not change.
The Gini Coeefficenet = the division of wealth in the country.
So no. The rich did not get richer under Bush.
You know who the Gini Coeeficient rised fastest on in recent history.
Bill Clinton.
Once again. Look at the hard facts. Not what some partisian tells you.
Now I thought Clinton was a lot better then Bush... however when it comes to division of wealth. Clinton was good for the rich. Bush wasn't.
