Greenpeace: Microsoft and Nintendo companies worst for the environment?

[SeriousWB]

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=21019&page=1

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=21014

There you go.

naznatips said:
Nintendo doesn't cooperate with Greenpeace because they don't release their production information to anyone they don't have to... which of course includes the environmental extremist group up on their pedestal. They got 0 because Green Peace was pissed that Nintendo wouldn't give them information, which is Nintendo's right.

naznatips said:

akuma587 said:
There is a big difference between power consumption of the console and environmental practices of the company. Depending on the specifics, the latter can be a lot worse than the former.

Except Nintendo's environmental practices are no different than Sony's or Microsoft's... Greenpeace just won't do any research on their own, and power consumption is a big issue.  

For reference: The average american household runs about 1000 watts of power at a time.  A PS3 uses 20% of the energy of an entire household.

Again though, it's ridiculous that people are considering Greenpeace a legitimate environmental group.  They barely qualify as more than terrorists, and they give a bad name to real environmental groups.