| kowenicki said: @ninjakido Yes it is... the two arent mutually exclusive. Without his hard work then the thousands, possibly tens of thousands, of people would not have been able to benefit from his cash. But this is semantics... we agree he is probably a good hard working man who is also extremely generous... yes? |
Well if helping others was the intentional effect he intended to have , then i'd agree . If the ability to help others was was merely the coincidental effect of his wealth then maybe not.
I'd agree he's a hard working man but extremley generous ? your bringing back the issue of a good act vs a good character again which I alreadly adressed.







