Framerates and such are facts.
What is better looking is opinion. People blabber on that x is better than y.
Jesus christ. My personal opinion is 360 has been ahead then PS3 then 360 again and then PS3 again.
Gears 1 was awesome and looked amazing. It was the leader. Then along came Uncharted and MGS4. In that time we had glorious looking Mass Effect and Bioshock.
After that GT5 P. Ooh then came Gears 2. but then came Killzone 2. But Killzone 2 is not leaps and bounds ahead of Gears 2. In fact there is areas where Gears 2 beats it. If it wasnt for the effects in KZ2 and animation, the rest goes to Gears 2. The single most amazing moment still belongs to Gears 2 for mae as far as I'm concerned. When you first step out into the underground caves. It looks stunning.
And before your fanboyism gets in the way OP, remember that Gears 2, Halo 3 are multiple players on one console. Split screen. Top PS3 graphics games you cant. Not even a shooter (where it's the satandard to have) KZ2 didnt have coop. It's possible it's because it wouldnt run as it is displaying the image twice??? Imagine Gears 2 without doing split screen. I'm sure it would undoubtly be improved.
My point is this. There is so much factors to consider, and so much of graphics is gonna depend on what art you like.
But remember this my friends, none of the games lately are really that far from each other. At no time have I ever played ANY game on either PS3 or 360 and thought that either machine was superior in graphics.







