Dark Chaos said:
BladeOfGod said:
Kasz216 said:
NightAntilli said:
I still find the arguments here funny.. "The PS3 is failing" "No it's not failing" "yes it is" "no it isn't".
Instead of throwing stupid words back and forth. Lets examine this a little closer. The first step is, explain what you mean by failing. You can look at this in different ways.
The first way is, the PS3 has been able to keep up to PS2 hardware sales, it has been able to keep up with PS1 hardware sales, so it isn't failing.
|
What? Not it hasn't. It's not even close.... what are you talking about.
PS3 is way behind PS2 even when you ignore the fact that the PS2 was much more staggered when it came to launches.
|
SO WHAT??? Just because its not selling as good as the PS2 doesn't mean is failing. GameCube couldn't outsell N64, N64, couldn't outsell SNES, SNES couldn't outsell the NES. But i don't see anybody saying these Nintendo consoles are failure. You don't expect every next Sony console to outsell the last one do you? PS3 is about to outsell all last gen consoles besides PS2,which is best selling console in the world
|
Wait. Take of your -$ony glasses. Gamecube had the highest software ratio and was profitable. N64 was second, profitable and had great games. Plus none are doing as bad as the PS2.
PS3 is the most expensive, has the least number of games, losses tons of money, last in sales and considering it was coming after the PS2 the most successful console in history. Its an epic fail
|
Oh I didn't mean to insult Nintendo or start console war Mr. Nintendo fanboy. I was just speaking the normal facts. Please dont get pissed off because of that.
Oh and i think by''Plus none are doing as bad as the PS2'' you thought''Plus none are doing as bad as the PS3''. Well guess what. PS3 is gonna outsell the GameCube very very soon, and PS3 is selling better than PS1 so why do you think N64 is doing better than PS3?
