Squilliam said:
Jordahn said:
Procrastinato said:
I prefer the PS3 version, personally. I find the frame-tearing unbearable on the 360. I have to wonder why Capcom chose to not v-sync the 360 (causing tearing, but a better FR), and apparently they v-synced the PS3 (seems to eliminate tearing, but the framerate dips to 20 now and then, since there's no v-syncable rate higher then 20.0 FPS under 30.0).
If the PS3 version is doing vertical sync, does the framerate appear more steady in PAL regions (where you could v-sync to 25 fps, instead of 20)?
Like I said though... I actually prefer the PS3 version, myself. Something about it is way more immersive. Might be the sound quality -- the PS3 audio hardware and output always seems superior to the 360. |
Some PS3 games are known to have 7.1 HD audio due to the available space on Blu-ray. Even if your audio hardware isn't HD audio compatible, it's still a "cleaner" signal that get downgraded to accomodated your audio hardware still being better than common lossy audio.
|
So if I listen to 128kb MP3 tracks will I notice a difference? 
|
I cannot answer that for you because your ears are not mines. From my expereince, I can hear the difference between a 128kb AAC audio file and a 320kb ACC files through my sound system. So wanting the best audio quality, I earlier decided to rip my CD's to my PS3 all at 320kb AAC. And this was all before upgrading my six year old a/v receiver. Now with my new 1.3 HDMI compatible a/v receiver, AAC audio files, DirecTV, DVD playback, Blu-ray playback, and console gaming all sound deeper, more robust, and clearer.
I realize you had a "" out to your question. Sorry, but I didn't get the joke.
