nordlead said:
Onyxmeth said:
kowenicki said:
errrr... isnt that the point of a vote?
|
Of course that's the point of the vote. I'm saying it isn't good to be voting on these things though, because I don't think the community is necessarily the best way to judge the future validity of iPhone games, no offense. Miyamoto has a quote I think works good in this context, although it's about game development.
“We don't pay a whole lot of attention to the Internet until people have played the game - then we pay a lot of attention to whether people liked it. We read through it and see it, but we don't take it into consideration. ... [The Internet] is not going to dictate the direction of where the game goes.”
I think this site is far too critical and self serving to truly judge whether iPhone games are good coverage for us or not. I don't mean every voter either, but I'm sure far too many are voting for the wrong reasons.
|
I agree, most are probably voting for the wrong reason. I think we should change the vote from yes/no to now/future. Currently I don't think it is the time.
|
I see your point, so maybe it's best to think up a compromise. Maybe it's not the right time to venture into looking for iPhone content, but I feel we should allow contributors to supply us with news content, reviews etc. on a volunteer basis, just with no admin pressure to get content out on the platform at this time. That way if a contributor does happen to finish an iPhone game and has the itch to review it, he would be able to.
