Possum5454 said:
amp316 said:
I'm sorry, but five hours seems way too short to me. It also seems to be an extremely common occurance in games recently. |
I don't know how you made it through the NES era.
|
Hahaha.
A few years ago I went nuts and started beating Super Mario Bros. in under 6 minutes at least 5 times a day for a month or 2.
Galaki said:
5 hours of bliss or 20 hours of grinding... hmmm...
Do you buy games based on how long they are rather than how good they are? |
I find that most games aren't fun enough to sustain 20 hours of my interest.
Khuutra said:
amp316 said:
Khuutra said:
amp316 said:
Khuutra said:
amp316 said:
Back then games didn't cost nearly as much. Also, for the most part, they were more challenging to play.
|
Are you serious? Am I just remembering wrong, here? I mean, even without factoring inflation.
|
In the NES era you're saying that they cost $60 dollars? No I wasn't around. My age is a lie.
|
I wasn't being sarcastic, I really don't know and I was actually asking you. How much did the average game cost? Like, how much was Zelda when it came out?
|
If you aren't being sarcastic, than how could you be remembering wrong? Zelda did cost quite a bit.
|
I'm only 21.
How much?
|
Way more than today's games, even before you count inflation.
