Soleron said:
Just because we haven't found an alternative yet doesn't mean we have to go for "God" by default. God is pretty unlikely even in the absence of other choices, due to the lack of evidence. So the rational thing is still to be atheist but willing to accept God or any other hypothesis as soon as one arises. For example, eople waited for a very long time for a good alternative to God for how life exists. Then evolution was proposed and now that's the best scientific theory we have for that question.
|
I wasn't really arguing for or against God. I was just criticizing his logic.
We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls. The only thing that really worried me was the ether. There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke
It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...." Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson
