Jordahn said:
Please do not vainly attempt to pervert the context of the situation. I gave my personal assessment in my original post... "It looks like Skate 2 and Need for Speed are better on the 360, Silent Hill and Endwar are better on the PS3, and the rest are just as equally good/bad." And it was obvously that you agreed with Eurogamer which is not a problem. Your problem was that you didn't want to respect a different opinion when you responed... "Silent Hill better on PS3? Really? Did we read the same article?" These are YOUR words. Which we did read the same article. And you're acting as if we did read the "same article," I'm suppose to automatically agree with you. You obviously agreed with Eurogamer (which is fine), and I had a difference of opinion from personal experience which for YOU was NOT fine but it should have been easily respected. Keep arguing and perverting things all you want becuase your own words betray you when I exposed your lack of a gamer's heart by not respecting a view that doesn't favors your console of choice. |
And what is wrong with my words?
"It looks like Skate 2 and Need for Speed are better on the 360, Silent Hill and Endwar are better on the PS3, and the rest are just as equally good/bad."
This does not sound as a personal opinion my friend, but as a comment of the eurogamer's article. No where in this article Richard Leadbetter wrote that Silent Hill and Endwar are better on the PS3. That it why I reply to you and disagree. After all I expect comments about the "Face of" article I post. If it was like "IMO Skate 2 and Need for Speed are better on the 360, Silent Hill and Endwar are better on the PS3" or "I disagree with Richard Leadbetter, Silent Hill and Endwar are better on the PS3", then this is a different story.







