BrayanA said:
And what did I said wrong? This - "Sorry, but this is not mine opinion" is for this - "I respect your opinion that ... 360 takes the edge" This - "Draw ... OK, but better? I don't think so." is for this - "Silent Hill and Endwar are better on the PS3" And yes the last one is mine opinion! As Richard Leadbetter said - one will choose better frame rate, others will "argue that the cost of that performance increase is too high a price considering how much has been pared down". That is why Richard Leadbetter didn't wrote that PS3 is a clear winner or 360 is a clear winner, as he did in Skate 2 or Need for Speed: Undercover.
|
Please do not vainly attempt to pervert the context of the situation.
I gave my personal assessment in my original post...
"It looks like Skate 2 and Need for Speed are better on the 360, Silent Hill and Endwar are better on the PS3, and the rest are just as equally good/bad."
And it was obvously that you agreed with Eurogamer which is not a problem. Your problem was that you didn't want to respect a different opinion when you responed...
"Silent Hill better on PS3? Really? Did we read the same article?"
These are YOUR words. Which we did read the same article. And you're acting as if we did read the "same article," I'm suppose to automatically agree with you. You obviously agreed with Eurogamer (which is fine), and I had a difference of opinion from personal experience which for YOU was NOT fine but it should have been easily respected. Keep arguing and perverting things all you want becuase your own words betray you when I exposed your lack of a gamer's heart by not respecting a view that doesn't favors your console of choice.
Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.
