could Gears of War 3 surpass Killzone 2? Let's have a debate

[michael-moore]

Dark Chaos said:

Pristine20 said:

Dark Chaos said:

Kantor said:

 

Unannounced. I'll believe it when I see it. Wasn't Resistance 2 supposed to look better than Gears 2?

His logic doesn't make much sense, but neither does your logic, because we have no proof of these unnannounced games looking better than KZ2. Of course, there are no more games being made for the GameCube, while plenty more are being made for 360.

He does have a point, though, in that despite the year advantage for MS, the best looking game so far this gen is on PS3. Partly because of four years of development, but still.

You forget to mention about $50 million spent just for the game to sell about 3.5million(unless bundled). And even if the PS3 has the better looking games that doesn't really make the console more successfull. Look at the GC and Xbox. I am sure MS is happy having a crapier looking game like Halo 3 sell 9million than having one which needed more money to make to only sell 3.5million.

 

...and what has that got to do with the topic? since graphics don't matter to M$, why are they promising to beat kz2? LMAO. And you're probably the type that runs around calling people "fanboys"

 

Got off topic.

OT: I doubt it. Gears of war 3 will have to probably have a new engine built to make it look better so the time frame for the game will prolly be the same as KZ2. Hence it will release on the next MS console. However, I am pretty sure games like Heavy rain will be the new industry standard for best looking game

 

 HEAVY RAIN DOES NOT INTEREST ME BUT IT WILL BE A GOOD LOOKING GAME NO DOUBT