RolStoppable said:
Mature interests, sure. Then you follow that with Sega didn't cater to that consistently before the Dreamcast. The Saturn had for the most part very similar games as the PS1. I fail to see how Sony's console was anymore "mature" than Sega's, except in the sheer number of games. I have never heard of that "kids only" logo, must be an American thing. Maybe it made it's way to the UK, but not to central Europe. Not that it matters much. I really don't think that there are many Nintendo fans like myself and I also don't think that a single person is representative for millions of gamers. |
Notice how I also used the word "consistently". That may have something to do with the number of "quality titles". Maybe sega's ad campaign failed but there's a reason why sega couldn't lure anywhere near as many people as sony did. This is why sony gets the credit not sega.
I came up with the term "kids only" as a summary of what sony thought the public should think of ninty through their PR.
Yes there are millions of nintendo fans like yourself. This is why nintendo prospered during the N64 and GC eras.
"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)
"WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler







