By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kantor said:
Onyxmeth said:

I don't get the criteria being used to get this comparison. No matter how I slice it,  at least one of these games seems like an odd man out. I'm assuming this was meant to present the top three games generally refered to as "shooters" but then I wonder why Killzone 2 wasn't booted in favor of Call of Duty 4 and World at War, or at least them being in the mix considering they have just as much chance of being the best to someone as any of the other three that were mentioned.

 

I'm guessing it's because they're multiplat.

Sad, really. I think CoD4 is brilliant.

As do I.

What you said makes sense when I think of the level of maturity at this site. It probably was simply a "who's exclusive shooters are better" thread. I guess I can answer that question though, since it's oh so original. The PS3's best exclusive shooter is Warhawk and the 360's is Gears of War 2. Warhawk is better. COD4 shits on all contenders though from where I'm standing. Bring on Modern Warfare 2 and then World at War 2.

 



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.