| PS360N64PSXBOX said: What Louie says is absolutely true, and in my opinion, there is another point coming with this generation which makes the graphics even less important. The Wii hasn't won yet and graphics mean more than you will admitt. I think graphics have become good enough with the sixth generation for most of the consumers. Back in the fifth generation, the graphics really showed that they need an improvement and sometimes the gameplay was handicapped because of the graphics as well. but with the ps2, the gc and the xbox graphics have come to a point were the average consumer is happy with it. i mean, many people say that the graphic of wii sports look crappy, but no average consumer will notice You never played a PS2.. those graphic sucked ass and had slow loading times. The graphics this gen for the 360 and PS3 have peaked. I vowed after the PS2 thing I would never buy a weak console again. The graphics were grainy on some games and it was obvious. Play RE4 on PS2 and on GC to get my point...Nasty!
i recently talked with a 14-year old boy who plans to buy a x360. i asked him why he wants it, and he answered because of its beautiful graphics. i asked him then why he don't want to buy a ps3 because it has better graphics, but he did not accept that point and said that ps3-graphics are even worse than xbox. he was not joking, he really meant it, and this proves my point. he has been told that x360 has great graphics, but he can't distinguish between xbox, x360 and ps3 graphics anymore because they all look good to him. Most experts agree the 360 has better graphics as the power between the two systems isn't great. But I can't varify if this happen with you, so I will just pass. |
1) Where exactly do I say the wii has already won? all i say is that graphic differences between consoles get less important.
2) I never owned a ps2, but i have played it. for me, the graphic differences between ps2 and gc don't really matter, and if i say that the average consumer does not realise the difference between ps3 and xbox, how could he realise the differences between ps2 and gc? btw, in your other post, you say: "And the PS2 was not much weaker than the GC, in fact you wouldn't notice so that is moot." so maybe you should stick with an argument and not change it from post to post, because this could make people believe that you are biased and just picking the argument out of the air which fits for you.
