By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SlumsofOhio said:
Um, for those who say Halo is better, have you played Killzone 2? I have both, and Killzone 2, once you get the controls to your liking, is a better game. And for the love of baby seals, stop using sales or metacritic to compare them. It makes you look very, very desperate. If you never played both, your opinion does not matter. Its biased. Plain and simple.

Soo...instead of USING $$$ or critical accliam, instead we should use fanboy metrics?  Seems to me, the BEST indicator of success is longivity...Coutner Strike is legendary...heck...it is as gold standard as you can get...and on console...Halo 3 is THE GOLD STANDARD...1 freaking billion matches...just think about it.  It's not like 360 owners are ONLY playing Halo 3...we play a crap load of games...and we buy a TON more of software, so even with all those OTHER games out there, people still play Halo to death...wow...when a game can do that...and you want to compare it to some game that was as hyped as ever...and it pushed less than a million?  Sorry, but using personal opinions as a metric is just plain wrong...it's like people who say linux is better...well than why aren't people using it more?  In sports, it's settled on the field, but somehow in gaming, people want to settle it on opinions...rather than performance.

 



"...You can't kill ideas with a sword, and you can't sink belief structures with a broadside. You defeat them by making them change..."

- From By Schism Rent Asunder