By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
numonex said:
SnakeEyez said:
numonex said:
I disagree with this article. Graphics should be in here as well and Kill Zone 2 would win that category. In regards to all the other categories Halo 3 is a better game than Killzone 2.
MP, Story, Weapons, enemies, replayability are all categories Halo 3 has advantage over Killzone 2.
BTW: The article is written by Gamepro who are biased towards Sony and PS3.

 

And ur not biased towards the 360? Why should we take ur opinion over theirs. Anyways, While I agree with the article, I'm smart enough to know that this is just an opinion and neither game is objectively better.

 

Lol @ that one guy that said that KZ2 got a 91 avg because it's graphics, and real score would be 86. Now that is just nonsense.

Controls is another area where Halo 3 is superior to Killzone 2. Halo 3 is easy to pick up and play and it has good controls in the game includes Auto-Aim. Killzone 2 has sluggish controls that feel heavy.Killzone 2 has no Auto-Aim.

Sales and popularity: Halo 3 is a huge popular game which will be played in years to come. Halo 3 will reach 10 million+ LTD. Killzone 2 will be lucky if it breaks 3 million sales LTD.

 

While I'll agree with u that Halo 3's controls are better than KZ2, how does that make it a better game. Having auto-aim does not make the game better, just makes it accessible to more people. Sales and popularity, again, do not make the game better. You are arguing an opinion, AKA what I like, not a fact.